Mayor de Blasio with his beautiful family - the loving picture of a new America. |
Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve, endorsed the
idea in a July 2012 speech, saying: “Economically speaking, early childhood
programs are a good investment, with inflation-adjusted annual rates of return
on the funds dedicated to these programs estimated to reach 10 percent or higher.
Very few alternative investments can promise that kind of return.”
But not everyone agrees, as many wealthy New Yorkers call de
Blasio’s tax plan offensive. Some New Yorkers have complained that his first agenda is to tax the rich to help poor children.
Doesn't look like Buzzy misses a meal. |
Convent of the Sacred Heart - Where's the heart moms? |
Perhaps we should review Luke 6:20-26:
And he lifted up his eyes on his
disciples, and said: “Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of
God. “Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you shall be satisfied. “Blessed
are you who weep now, for you shall laugh. “Blessed are you when people hate
you and when they exclude you and revile you and spurn your name as evil, on
account of the Son of Man! Rejoice in that day, and leap for joy, for behold,
your reward is great in heaven; for so their fathers did to the prophets. “But
woe to you who are rich, for you have received your consolation.”
But what of the less fortunate? De Blasio speaks of a New York as a “Tale of
Two Cities,” where almost half of New York residents are poor or
struggling. About 46 percent of
four-person New York families had incomes of no more than about $46,000, or
roughly 150 percent of the city’s poverty level in 2011, according to an April
report from the Center for Economic Opportunity, an agency Mayor Michael
Bloomberg created in 2006 to measure and develop programs for the poor. It said
21 percent lived below the poverty line of about $31,000 for a family of four
in 2011.
From 2000 to 2010, the median income of the city’s eight
wealthiest neighborhoods jumped 55 percent, according to the Fiscal Policy
Institute. During the same period, median income fell 3 percent in
middle-income areas and 0.2 percent in the poorest neighborhoods, according to
U.S. Census data. So pity the rich. It must be so hard. The city's richest 1 percent took home 39
percent of all earnings in 2012, up from 12 percent in 1980, according to the
Fiscal Policy Institute, a nonprofit research group in New York.
So de Blasio has called upon some of the city’s wealthiest
individuals, to provide about $532 million for universal all-day
pre-kindergarten and after-hours middle-school programs. According to a study conducted by
WealthInsight, New York City is home to 70 billionaires, the most in the world;
including former Mayor Bloomberg. New
York is also home to 389,000 multi-millionaires, defined as individuals with
over $30m each.
De Blasio’s plan would raise the marginal tax rate on
incomes above $500,000 to 4.4 percent from almost 3.9 percent. For the 27,300
city taxpayers earning $500,000 to $1 million, the average increase would be
$973 a year, according to the Independent Budget Office, a municipal agency.
In New York City I’ve spent more than that on a bottle of
wine at dinner. Perhaps it’s disgusting
I can indulge so, but I support this tax 100%.
For those making $1 million to $5 million, the average extra
bite would rise to $7,793, the budget office said. At incomes of $5 million to $10 million, it
would climb to $33,518, and for those earning more than $10 million, it would
mean paying $182,893 more.
Sounds like a lot?
Let’s compare. The Gulfstream
G650, the favorite of the New York’s wealthy, costs a cool $64.5 million
(2013). But like everything else, you
have to maintain that toy. According to
Daniel Kearns, Aircraft Broker, the annual fixed costs of this toy are: Pilots
- $231,750.00; Crew Training - $69,380.80; Hangar - $80,000.00; Insurance -
$60,000.00; Aircraft Miscellaneous - $28,500.00; for a “modest” total of
$444,630.80 per year. Then you have to
add the variable costs (these are hourly) of about $3,263.51 per hour (i.e.,
fuel, maintenance). All for a modest
cost ranging from $770,981.80 (100 Hours flying) to $3,708,140.80 (1000 Hours
flying).
And then a must for any New Yorker of wealth is a summer
home in New York’s Hamptons, the resort towns on the Long Island coast; which
according to Douglas Elliman Real Estate the average price has reached a neat
$2.13 million. (That of course only buys in the slums of Hampton adjacent
areas. The median price for all luxury
transactions, the top 10 percent of all sales by price, climbed 17 percent from
a year earlier to $7 million, Miller Samuel and Douglas Elliman said.
Then you have to have a car.
The must have for the “socially” conscience elite is the Mercedes-Benz
G-Class Wagon. The 2013 G63 AMG 4dr 4x4
has a base price of $134,300. Add a few
options and you’re just under $200,000. Then you have to park it. The scarcity of parking has made it a
must-have for wealthy apartment buyers, who view a space much as they do a
fireplace or a walk-in closet. A spot can cost well over $200,000, or, if
rented, more than $2,000 a month for one space. That is just the first car.
And of course one needs nannies for the children. Luckily, they come relatively cheaply. Live-in nannies, make an average of $713 a
week, which comes to $37,076 a year. Even in posh Park Slope, home of
high-priced strollers and children’s clothes that cost more than your average
businessman’s suit, earn $16.41 an hour. For those working 50 hours a week,
that comes to just $42,666 a year.
Wider Opportunities for Women has calculated how much it
takes a family to meet its basic needs without relying on government subsidies,
finding that it takes a single parent of a preschooler $41,872 a year to just
hit the low mark. Add in another adult and another child and the number jumps
up to $59,027.
Remember, about 46 percent of four-person New York families
had incomes of no more than about $46,000 and 21 percent lived below the
poverty line of about $31,000 for a family of four in 2011.
So exactly what is offensive?
Since the 1970s, the gap between the rich and the poor has
never been more severe. Wealth disparity is at its highest level in a century.
This ever increasing divide of the haves and have-nothings is cause for concern
in that America was built upon a healthy middle class. More disturbing is that I see a growth of a
more shameful divide. More and more privileged
people I know are lacking ability to see oneself in a less advantaged person’s
shoes. Reducing the economic gap may be nearly impossible; but I think there is still hope for addressing the
divide in empathy.
So how does society address this lack of appreciation and understanding for those less fortunate? Many people look to their religion and church for guidance. For example, in Christianity one only need look to the Scriptures for guidance.
So how does society address this lack of appreciation and understanding for those less fortunate? Many people look to their religion and church for guidance. For example, in Christianity one only need look to the Scriptures for guidance.
The Scriptures say that governmental authority is to protect
the poor in particular. The biblical prophets are consistent and adamant in
their condemnation of injustice to the poor, and frequently follow their
statements by requiring the king (the government) to act justly. That prophetic
expectation did not apply only to the kings of Israel but was also extended to
the kings of neighboring lands and peoples.
Psalm 72 begins with a prayer for kings or political leaders: "Give
the king your justice, O God, and your righteousness to a king's son. May he
judge your people with righteousness, and your poor with justice? May the
mountains yield prosperity for the people, and the hills, in righteousness. May
he defend the cause of the poor of the people, give deliverance to the needy,
and crush the oppressor."
So Christians should be wholly supportive of this plan. Right??? But based upon the comments of so may privileged New Yorkers, it doesn't appear that Church or Temple is working.
The government should be there to support the poor. And woe to the rich who say this is “offensive.” Luke 18:25 : “I'd say it's easier to thread a camel through a needle's eye than get a rich person into God's kingdom."
Big Surprise - A Pope in his G-Wagon |
The government should be there to support the poor. And woe to the rich who say this is “offensive.” Luke 18:25 : “I'd say it's easier to thread a camel through a needle's eye than get a rich person into God's kingdom."
What would Jesus say if he walked in our society today?
I’m an atheist, but my guess is the Jesus written about in
the bible would tell these hypocrites they will be burning in hell for eternity
based on that vengeful father of Jesus that some call God. And even though I don't believe in a deity, I do believe in helping the less fortunate. The best of societies are the ones where those who have the most reach out and help those that are struggling and in need.